Author: Street Sweeper

Political drive

At the top, I would like to express my condolences to KFAB’s Gary Sadlemyer, and all of his family and friends, after the death of his wife.

Before her death, Sadlemyer eloquently told listeners (which he didn’t have to do) why he had been gone from his seat in the station at various times recently, and expressed his love and devotion to his wife.

We send our prayers to them and for them at this difficult time.

 

Oh, what do commenters want to discuss?

So lets dive into the Charlottesville issue, because of course. The only local angle seems to be, “how MUCH do you hate Nazis?” (Which is pretty much a direct quote from “Monty Python’s Life of Brian”, when Brian was asked just how MUCH he hated the Romans. Brian’s response: “a LOT!”)

As much as the President is getting criticized for his statements, the one that really missed the mark is when he said, “very fine people on both sides”.

Here’s the deal: Let’s say there’s a good ole’ boy, never meanin’ no harm, who hates racism, but feels like the taking down the Robert E. Lee statue is an affront to his heritage. He feels like one of the “Dukes of Hazzard” who named their car the “General Lee”.

There’s an argument to be made there. Not necessarily a winning argument (Pat Borchers is one of many pointing out the reasoning behind so many Confederate statues). But it is an argument that can be made without it meaning that you’re automatically pro-slavery or pro-Jim Crow, or something.

But the PROBLEM with this particular march, in Charlottesville, was that it was billed as a “White Lives Matter Rally”. And then the torches came out. And then the literal battle lines were drawn between the two sides. And the whole statue thing was an afterthought.

At any of those points, if you were actually the above-referenced “good ole’ boy, never meanin’ no harm”, the literal red-flag should have told you to turn around and go home. You don’t join the march. You don’t pick up a torch. If you do, you just lost your “never meanin’ no harm” badge, and you sure as hell aren’t a “fine person”.

There were no “good Nazis” there (like a Max von Sydow in “Victory” or Sgt. Schulz in “Hogan’s Heroes“).

Clear enough? Good.

Now, let’s jump to the OTHER side of the literal battle lines.

If you show up to protest said Nazis and White Supremacists, good for you. Getting a permit is a better thing, but let’s say you’re being generally peaceful. (As near as I’ve read, it seems that the woman who was killed in the car attack was among those protesting peacefully.)

Nota bene: “Peaceful” doesn’t mean you try to get in the face of the dude with the Nazi flag to try to instigate him. And it should go without saying that “peaceful” also doesn’t include bringing and using your preferred battle items for when you plan to throw down with the other side.

And here, we are specifically calling out the “Antifa” nut jobs who have done this across the country, using violence to get their way or make their points.

As the New York Times noted:

Unlike most of the counterdemonstrators in Charlottesville and elsewhere, members of antifa have shown no qualms about using their fists, sticks or canisters of pepper spray to meet an array of right-wing antagonists whom they call a fascist threat to American democracy. As explained this week by a dozen adherents of the movement, the ascendant new right in the country requires a physical response.

Jonah Goldberg of National Review writes about this today:

Fighting Nazis is a good thing, but fighting Nazis doesn’t necessarily make you or your cause good. By my lights this is simply an obvious fact.

The greatest Nazi-killer of the 20th century was Josef Stalin. He also killed millions of his own people and terrorized, oppressed, enslaved, or brutalized tens of millions more. The fact that he killed Nazis during the Second World War (out of self-preservation, not principle) doesn’t dilute his evil one bit

.

The young Communists and fascists fighting for power in the streets of 1920s Germany had far more in common with each other than they had with decent liberals or conservatives, as we understand those terms today. That’s always true of violent radicals and would-be totalitarians.

As Hitler solidified power and effectively outlawed the Communist Party of Germany, The Communist International (Comintern) abandoned its position that socialist and progressive groups that were disloyal to Moscow were “fascist” and instead encouraged Communists everywhere to build “popular fronts” against the common enemy of Nazism.

These alliances of convenience with social democrats and other progressives were a great propaganda victory for Communists around the world because they bolstered the myth that Communists were just members of the Left coalition in the fight against Hitler, bigotry, fascism, etc.

(President Trump) borrowed from Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity the bogus term “alt-left” to describe the antifa radicals.

The term is bogus for the simple reason that, unlike the alt-right, nobody calls themselves “the alt-left.” And that’s too bad. One of the only nice things about the alt-right is that its leaders are honest about the fact that they want nothing to do with traditional American conservatism. Like the original Nazis, they seek to replace the traditional Right with their racial hogwash.

The antifa crowd has a very similar agenda with regard to traditional American liberalism. These goons and thugs oppose free speech, celebrate violence, despise dissent, and have little use for anything else in the American political tradition. But many liberals, particularly in the media, are victims of the same kind of confusion that vexed so much of American liberalism in the 20th century. Because antifa suddenly has the (alt-)right enemies, they must be the good guys. They’re not.

And that’s why this debate is so toxically stupid. Fine, antifa isn’t as bad as the KKK. Who cares? Since when is being less bad than the Klan a major moral accomplishment?

This is the point that is worthwhile, and may be the point that the President rather ham-handedly was trying to make.

And another thing to ask: The guy who drove the car into everyone at the Nazi rally. Is he “better” or “worse” than the guy who shot up the Republican Congressional baseball practice? As far as I’m concerned, they’re both going to Hell. The only difference is what sort of ironic punishment Satan decides to give them for eternity.

(And as I get ready to post this, it looks like Steve Bannon is out at the White House, which will be a joy to many, including Goldberg and others at National Review, who have despised Bannon’s seemingly close ties to the alt-Right movement.)

 

If only Ashford’s preferred candidate, Jeb Bush, had been elected…

Onto happier thoughts…

Congressman Don Bacon was on the Twitters asking…

I agreed with 2014 version of who opposed ACA…but he flipflopped on this like many other issues. Maybe he’ll flip again?

Well Congressman, there was word that at Brad Ashford’s recent “townhall” (no word on why Ashford didn’t have ONE of these when he was an actual House Rep…) he did just that flipping and flopping.

Ashford reportedly said that he would favor an increase in the Social Security age. Which is surprising, since Ashford slammed Bacon for this in the 2016 campaign. And as a matter of fact, the DCCC spent about $2M attacking Bacon for this position.

So Ashford has been on both sides of ObamaCare. Both sides of the Keystone Pipeline. Now apparently both sides of the Social Security issue.

As someone once said, voters want a compass, not a weathervane.

 

Nebraska values

Senator Deb Fischer had three bills passed in the U.S. Senate before Congress recessed for the August break. (You can read the details of them here.)

Since then she has been traveling across Nebraska meeting with groups and other constituents — as she does every August.

Then again, Fischer is back in Nebraska nearly every weekend, so August meetings aren’t any real change to her busy schedule.

 

Driving me nuts

Here is a story that ground my gears this morning — as someone who started their political career as a driver on a statewide campaign.

Politico has a story about a staff memo leaked from a Congressional office on “Instructions on Staffing and Driving” for the Congressman in his Indiana Congressional district.

The Politico headline is: The agonizing, 8-page memo on how to chauffeur a congressman – Pity the poor aide charged with driving Rep. Todd Rokita around his district.

No, pity the boss of the snowflakes who wrote this article.

As a former driver, I never had a candidate or anyone else I had to drive treat me any way other than respectfully. (That being said, they’re not ALL like that, but surprise.)

But this memo is for a young or inexperienced staffer to learn how to be prepared, as well as to understand that they’re not out on a burger run with their buddy. They are driving a mobile office. Their job is to treat the Member the same way they would if they were sitting in their office with them. This is especially the case where “Driver” is often one of the entry-level type positions for the new kid out of college, who never had a job before, now in close daily proximity to the top person in the office.

Maybe this particular Rep is known has a hard-ass, with lots of turnover or some such. Unknown. But if you’re new to politics, or any office situation, you could do a LOT worse than having this type of memo to let you know the basics of doing your job.

That the writers here don’t understand, and sneer at this, is also part of the problem.

 

Workin’ for it

Say hey, thanks for reading and have a great weekend!

Remember to Follow @LeavenworthSt on the Twitter and Like Leavenworth St. on The Facebook!

Meet the new litmus test. Same as the old litmus test.

Take back the old district?

Dems are still flailing about after the dust-storm that was kicked up when Pro-Choice Bernie Sanders joined “Pro-Life” Heath Mello on stage during the Omaha Mayor’s campaign.

Since then, there has been a great deal of wailing and teeth-gnashing about whether the Dems are a Big-Tent party, or require a pro-abortion litmus test.

In the past week, it went like this:

U.S. Rep. Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico, who is chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said the party would have to “be a big family” if it wants to regain control of the U.S. House and should not withhold financial backing from candidates opposed to abortion.

“There is not a litmus test for Democratic candidates,” Luján said.

 

Not having any of that, Pro-Choicer Lindy West wrote in a New York Times Op-Ed, headlined:

Of Course Abortion Should Be a Litmus Test for Democrats

She went on to say:

Democratic candidates are perfectly welcome to refrain from terminating their own pregnancies. But to be anti-choice on a policy level is absolutely indefensible from an economic justice, racial justice, gender justice and human rights standpoint. And if the Democratic Party does not stand for any of those things, then what on earth is it?

 

Then candidate for the Dem nomination to Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District, Kara Eastman wrote in a mini Tweet-storm:

Brad Ashford & other Democratic candidates are perfectly welcome to refrain from terminating their own pregnancies.

Everyone should be able to decide if, when, how, and with whom they start or grow a family.

I’m proud to be the only pro-choice candidate in the race for the Nebraska Second Congressional District.

If you agree, and want an elected official that isn’t going to back down from this fight, I hope that I can count on your support.

 

And then she laid into Brad Ashford…

@BradAshford18 – if I am wrong on any of this, please, give me a call. Nothing would make me happier than to know that you’re pro-choice.

You also voted ‘Yes’ on LB 1103 prohibiting abortion after 20 weeks.

You voted ‘Yes’ on LB 675, which wanted women to view their ultrasounds prior to an abortion procedure.

While running as a Democrat in 2014 for Congress, you stated that you strongly opposed abortion on the Faith2Action Survey.

As a Democrat running for Congress in 2014, you again stated that you were strong opposed to abortion being a woman’s unrestricted right.

 

Ashford and his wife have been pushing back against Eastman, with Tweets such as…

You need to stop misleading statements.

Of course, Brad is trying to play both sides of this issue, much like he has on health care, (not to mention what party he is in).

But it will be fun to watch Kara go as far left as she thinks, and see how far Brad is willing to go — both knowing they’d have to run back to the center in November.

 

Here they are at their “County Fair”

CNN sent a reporter and camera crew west of Lincoln (gasp!) to David City, Nebraska do a story on the hillbillies…er…huskers who still support President Donald Trump.

A recent Gallup poll showed 52% of Nebraskans STILL support the President of the United States, and the national reporter wanted to find out what these rubes…er…Red Staters were thinking.

For instance…

Asked why their support for Trump is still so strong despite no concrete legislative successes in his first six months, supporters here quickly blame “obstructionists”

They “quickly blame”… see because they’re not even thinking about it. They’re just knee-jerk goobers…er…conservatives who will support the President no matter WHAT he does.

Oh and…

Any mention of Russia to these resident prompts bristling and instant dismissal.

Well, there’s your bi-annual view of life out in fly-over country.

Lord help them if they ever make it all the way to Broken Bow.

 

Bold enough?

So here’s one that was passed on to Leavenworth St.

It seems that with the continual hammering of the Keystone XL Pipeline, some on the union side of the state Democratic party have had it with Chairperson Jane Kleeb.

Rumor in the Capitol is that unions are no longer donating to the NDP. They are, we have been told, saying that Jane either needs to leave Bold Nebraska or step down as Chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party.

The double-dutying of Kleeb is certainly something that could get under the hide of those whose jobs she is trying prevent. The unions have been long supporters of the party, but have also been supporters of the pipeline.

Jane has been having it both ways as head of both.

 

Coolio

Have a great weekend and be sure to follow @LeavenworthSt on the Twitter and Like Leavenworth St. on the Facebook for updates all weekend long!

Who’s gonna run?

Low intern on the totem pole gets this gig…

News Channel Nebraska’s Joe Jordan talked to Jane Kleeb the other day about fielding candidates for the two major statewide offices in the 2018 elections.

Jane’s lament?

Too much money in politics….

Whose money, you ask?

Well…not Dick Holland’s money…which was funding Jane’s Bold Nebraska for years.

Or the Nebraska State Teacher’s Association’s money, which has funded numerous Democrats over the years as well. Then there’s the Firefighter’s Union cash which has been spent against any number of candidates, including very recently.

Nope, Jane and her cohorts are scared off by…Pete Ricketts’ money (or maybe one could say Joe Ricketts’ money, ya know). Let’s hear Jane herself:

“Pete Ricketts’ money is a serious problem, not only for the top of the ticket but below as well.”

That’s a funny whine.
We must have missed that from the Democrats against Ricketts’ money in 2006.

But ignoring Joe’s clickbait in the rest of the story (no, Jane Kleeb does not say she is going to run…), Jane says that they WILL have candidates in both offices statewide, Ricketts’ cash notwithstanding.

So what does all this money-fearing mean then?

Well, it likely means that serious candidates — the type who can win — won’t be showing their faces across the county fairs over the next month to challenge in the Governor’s race, or against Senator Deb Fischer.

Sure they may get Dave Domina or a Mike Meister. But will they get a Kim Robak — who has a little bit of name ID? Boy, you’d think if she were interested she’d be raising money for a serious campaign already.

And then if they can’t find a candidate for Governor or Senator, what hope do they have for Secretary of State or Treasurer?

Are those offices the long game or the short game?
Someone can ask Jane (when she’s done reining in her central committee, that is…)

 

Whoa.

Oh and hey, Governor Ricketts also has a primary challenger now.

No, Bob Krist didn’t go back to being a Republican again.

It’s someone named Krystal Gabel, who recently came in 3rd place in the District 2 (North Omaha) City Council primary.

Gabel is running on a platform of industrial hemp, hemp biodiesel and decriminalized weed.

She clearly has the GOP voter nailed down…

 

Midtermers

The Hill is continuing to review the chances of the Dems taking Congress in 2018. Historically, the party out of power has done well in the mid-terms, and the University of Virginia’s Larry Sabato doesn’t see any reason why 2018 should be any different:

By Sabato’s analysis, the president’s party has shed House seats in 36 of 39 midterms stretching back more than 150 years, with an average loss of 33 seats — well above the 24 pickups the Democrats need to take the chamber next year.

And then there’s the fact that…

Democrats still face unique challenges, including legislative district lines that favor Republicans and the danger that Democratic voters simply will not go to the polls in a non-presidential election year.

Which of course brings it all back to…the actual candidates.

The Hill only focuses on a few specific candidates who could have tough races — and gives a broad swipe at GOPers who voted to repeal ObamaCare while representing swing districts.

And no, Don Bacon is not listed.

Do you hear that clamoring to get rid of Bacon and bring in Eastashfordman?
Neither do I.

 

2020 Vision

And then what about…President?
Well, that’s 2020 (just like hindsight…).

But CNN’s Chris Cillizza (formerly of the Washington Post, who has since found his true Trump-hate) wanders down the path of a Trump primary in 2020.

His speculations…
Sen. Ted Cruz
Sen. Jeff Flake
Gov. John Kasich
Gov. Scott Walker and…

Sen. Ben Sasse.

Well, it’s not the first time Sasse has been on one of these lists. But strangely, the National Review has a video up of who THEY think could be on the list.

And they have the same list, but swap out Sen. Marco Rubio for Flake.

Which still leaves Sasse with his home base magazine.

Interestingly enough, ICYMI, Sasse also apparently turned down an offer from the Heritage Foundation to become their new President.

In the past, former Senator Jim DeMint headed up the conservative thinktank. Unclear why the org thought they could get Sasse to quit his elected office only about halfway into his term.

But word was that Sasse rebuffed them, and Sasse’s press flak for some reason issued a statement that Sasse wants Nebraska offensive coordinator Danny Langsdorf out of his job before the season even starts.

So there ya go.

 

No, where have YOU been?

Been missing Leavenworth St. on a daily basis? Well there are places to go and things to do, ya know. But Leavenworth St. DID recently put up a Separated at Birth, along with links to numerous other daily articles.

All you have to do is Follow @LeavenworthSt on the Twitter or Like Leavenworth St. on The Facebook. You’ll still (usually) get your daily dose. Just in smaller, easily digestible quantities.

Sign yer bad-self up.

Unsaid

Volunteers with the Congressional Leadership Fund super PAC make calls. (Ryan Henriksen/For The Washington Post)

Paul Hammel has a story in the OWH about the Keystone XL Pipeline hearings in Omaha. He mentions some of the people who are for and against it — focusing on the story of the oil spill in Montana.

And he tosses out that there were 4 Nebraska State Senators there in favor of the #KXL:

Proponents, who included two current and two former state senators, said oil pipelines were 400 times safer in transporting oil than railcars or trucks.

That’s sort of nebulous, right?

Proponents said…

So who were the State Senators?

Well, Hammel did find the space in a few of his Tweets to mention who they were:

Former Senators Mike Flood and Scott Lautenbaugh (both Republicans).
Current Senator Jim Smith (also Republican).

And current Senator…Mike McDonnell, very much a Democrat.
And not just a Democrat, but a Union Democrat, former head of the fire fighters’ union.

Now of course Hammel is legally obliged to print Jane Kleeb’s name in any story that hints of the #KXL pipeline.

But you’d think that his Tweet mentioning McDonnell, and Kleeb’s response (to Joe Jordan) that “Bold Nebraska doesn’t take issue with unions who support the pipeline“, would trigger some sort of news.

New Democrat State Senator and former union chief is pro-pipeline.
Former Democrat Mayoral candidate Heath Mello is pro-pipeline.
Former Congressman Brad Ashford is pro-pipeline…WHOOPS! Scratch that! Ashford needs to win a primary now, so he’s now ANTI-pipeline.

In any case, it seemed an interesting omission from Hammel in his front-page story, when it was a perfectly cromulent point to make in his Tweets.

But then again, why make a point in the Omaha paper, about an Omaha hearing, with a sitting Omaha Senator…when it doesn’t jibe with the desired point to be made in those first few paragraphs about someone from Montana?

 

Democracy Dies in Darkness

But if the OWH can’t cover Omahans, at least the Washington Post does. Yesterday, the Post published an awaited article about Speaker Paul Ryan’s Congressional Leadership Fund and their efforts in Nebraska’s 2nd District to help re-elect Congressman Don Bacon.

(If you don’t subscribe to the Washington Post online, you may be blocked from reading it, but the mobile version is available…)

The story’s headline, for some reason, focuses on the CLF’s efforts to elect Reps in swing Congressional Districts like the 2nd… while not mentioning President Trump in their messaging. But the rest of the story focuses on the CLF’s efforts to go door-to-door with a heavy volunteer base, pointing out Bacon’s support on important local issues.

They note that the Dems want the election to be a referendum on Trump, while the door-to-door volunteers keep noting where Bacon stands.

And the head of the CLF makes a few points about Ashford as well:

Ashford, “would be driven to the left to please Democratic activists and put away a primary challenger.”

Oh come on, would Ashford be pro-KXL Pipeline if he could be so easily driven…oh. Well. Scratch that.

And then Ashford can’t even bring himself to publicly state he would vote for Nancy Pelosi — who he voted for before, and with whom he had a secret meeting in Omaha — saying, “it wasn’t clear whether she’d even run for speaker again…”

Right Brad. Oh, and note that Brad also used to support Jeb Bush for President and will be “whatever you want him to be” when it comes to party membership.

It’s funny how the media will focus on the protests and marches of the Democrats, and emphasize the angry “grass-roots” on The Left.

But here are volunteers, a year and a half out, calling thousands of people and walking thousands of doors, getting their candidate’s message out.

That is impressive.
And THAT is effective.

Something tells me that these high-school kids are not chucking bags of blood at their opponents.

 

Bernie and Betsy Bros Bags of Blood

Ah and speaking of bags of blood, your local Democrat supporters have done it again, ICYMI. This time chucking bags of blood at the office doors of both Senator Deb Fischer and Senator Ben Sasse.

This, right around the time that Rep. Steve Scalise is released from the hospital after an attempted assassination attempt by a Bernie Bro who didn’t like the way some Republicans voted on health care, and tried to murder as many as he could.

Funny, I saw that Democrat Chair Jane Kleeb could give a comment about pipeline support and something about a “knot in the ass” but can’t bring herself to even criticize these Betsy Riot nutjobs who keep this up in Nebraska.

The silence is deafening.

 

Statewide

And obviously, feel free to jump in on all of the national issues as well. Leavenworth St. tries to focus on the Nebraska angles when possible.

So while the Health Care debate is interesting of course, both of Nebraska’s Senators have voted to repeal and replace, or repeal and later replace.

And while the transgender soldiers issue will be in the news, there is no current procedure worked out for anything, so that discussion will be a lot of heated nothing for a while.

But that never stopped you.

So while you’re diving into that, Commenters, two questions for you:

1) Who are the Democrats going to run for Governor?
2) Who are the Democrats going to run for U.S. Senate?

Whether they have a prayer at winning either of those seats is moot for now.
Is Bob Kerrey going to move back soon?

Dive in.

Stothert for Governor…Mayor…

Omaha Mayor Jean Stothert, and supporters

Speaking with News Channel Nebraska‘s Joe Jordan earlier in the week (and is it just me or does “sandhillsexpress.com” need a new URL?), Omaha Mayor Jean Stothert put forward a couple of tantalizing plans for her political future.

After completely shutting down any ideas of her running for the House or Senate, she left another two open:

1) Running to become the first 3-term Mayor in Omaha
2) Running for Governor in 2022.

The Mayor’s 2nd term will be up in 2021.
And other than having the job that arguably has more effect on people’s daily lives than any other elected position, there are a few other “political” perks:

When you run, it’s a bang-bang Primary and General. No one likes raising money and no one really likes the forever campaigns that take an entire year. The public’s focus only really lasts so long, and having the Primary and General only a month apart is an attractive part of running for Mayor.

The other is the idea of being the longest serving Mayor in Omaha history. You’ve heard that mentioned about Dave Heineman as Nebraska Governor, and he is likely to be in the record books for some time (note that he took over after Mike Johanns left to become Ag Secretary, so his two terms were on top of that, before being term-limited).

Being a two-term Mayor — and the first woman to do so — is significant, but being a THREE term Mayor would solidify her place in Omaha history.

Ah but what of the 2022 Governor’s race?

It will (likely) be an open seat. And the Republican primary is often the real battle for the race. Any of those dynamics could change, but coming from one of the top political offices in the state would be a good jumping-off point.

And if Stothert made that decision, she would most very likely not be running for re-election in 2021, instead turning her full attention to 2022.

She’ll have a few years before decisions will need to be made, but the options on the table are interesting.

And we’ll only have to wait three years to find out!

 

Murante for Treasurer

Well, the waiting is no-longer for State Senator John Murante of Big Fred’s Gretna.

He will be making an announcement on his future political plans at 10:30am on Monday the 24th in the Capitol rotunda.

The word is State Treasurer, as has been noted here before.

We haven’t heard much yet from the other person who already has a web site up, Taylor Royal.

Royal has a site up under “TaylorJRoyal.com“, and an early Google ad had it up as his State Treasurer site. But he side-stepped that when asked, and now the site has a timer on it, ticking down to 31+ days.

Which means it’s up on either August 21st or 22nd (my math’s not that good).

So either he’ll be announcing near one of those days….OR he is REALLY looking forward to the Solar Eclipse, and he’s just getting us all ready.

Question will be if anyone else wants to jump in that GOP Primary.

 

Eyes on August

As the Health Care debate rages on, reporters are trying to tug info from the various players. Senator Ben Sasse is all for the “repeal now, then figure something else out later” approach. Some, like Rand Paul, favor that plan (though Jonah Goldberg for one questions the sincerity of Paul‘s position).

Yesterday on her weekly call with reporters (which, by the way, not every Senator does, by any means) Senator Deb Fischer was cagey about what she wants out of a Health Care proposal.

She noted that the Senate will likely start with the House version, then start the amendment process. She also noted that she would prefer repeal and replace at the same time.

During the call, she took a moment to note that the biggest issue she hears from constituents is the issue of  affordability. She noted that people have found their premiums skyrocketing and their deductibles over the moon.

Pretty sure that’s not what was promised under Obamacare.

Could be an exciting August.

 

Fix-It Felix

And for your watching pleasure, check out this video from Prager University on why Government Can’t Fix Healthcare. (Hint: it needs to be market based.)

Nearly all of the Prager U videos are great. Pick your favorite on any subject and you’ll be enriched in a few minutes.

 

Have a great weekend! (And remember to follow Leavenworth St. on the social media to keep updated all weekend long!

Follow @LeavenworthSt on the Twitter
Like Leavenworth Street – the talk of Nebraska politics on The Facebook

Numbers of the Day

Congressman Don Bacon announced his campaign filings with the Federal Election Commission yesterday — raising over $270K for the second quarter of 2017, with a total of over $500K for the year.

So let us compare a couple of other announced candidate for #NE02.

Kara Eastman announced for the 2nd District seat, officially, on May 24th. She had things in the works before then of course, and started fund raising right away.

So, while Don Bacon raised $270K during that period, Kara Eastman raised…$30K. And she’s already spent half of that.

Hmm.

And then there’s Brad Ashford.

FORMER REP Brad Ashford.

Now Ashford announced about a month ago. BUT, he stated back in APRIL that you could “take it to the bank” that either he or his wife would run for Congress.

Well, it doesn’t seem that Ashford has been making too many trips to the bank at all.

Ashford’s total receipts this year: $12K.

(And he’s spent about $9K of that.)

Hey kids, it’s not ALL about money.

But then you have to have SOME money to actually run, you know, a campaign.

That being said, this is the Democrat primary we’re talking about, so a few of those meet-up posters stapled to the light pole outside of Whole Foods should pretty much do it… and bang, Primary.

 

Re-Pete

The other numbers we can throw out (H/T LJS’s Zach Pluhacek) are those from the Morning Consult which show Governor favorability across the nation.

Nebraska’s Pete Ricketts did not crack the Top Ten…but he did hit the Top 15:

In the mean time, some Democrat and Bob Krist are hoping to split up that 28%.

Leavenworth St. has heard other numbers that indicate Ricketts with more faltering numbers than that, particularly in the 2nd District. And then Don Walton is convinced that the torches and pitchforks are coming from Greater Nebraska.

But for Ricketts? Hey he’s doing better than the Cubs right now…

 

Riotous

Oh and hey, speaking of those Democrats that we discussed above.

It seems that the Black Caucus of the Democrat Central Committee has taken out their wrath on Chelsey Gentry Tipton (remember her), for her Facebook comments after the assassination attempts in the DC area.

The Black Caucus “censured” her and removed her as Chair of the Caucus.

And good for them. Seems like a bit of a no-brainer, but here’s kudos when they do the right thing.

It would just be nice if the rest of the party could get a handle on the other cretins running amok amongst their supporters.

This time it was “someone” throwing what appeared to be fake blood on the door of Senator Deb Fischer’s office in Lincoln.

Isn’t that lovely.

And who do you suppose did this?
The Tea Party?
Libertarians?
The YRs?

No…

“A sticker belonging to Betsy Riot, a progressive protest group, was found on the door as well…”

So there you go.

Hey Democrats, how about while you’re making motions in your committees you get a hold of the rest of the nutjobs in your party.

The ones who throw blood and the ones who wear masks and the ones who march around with “FUDGE!” on their shirts (but it doesn’t say “fudge”…).

You claim to want to have a decent dialog and then this is what we see on a weekly basis from your supporters.

They’re your people. Figure it out.

 

Follow @LeavenworthSt on the Twitter
Like Leavenworth Street – the talk of Nebraska politics on The Facebook

Bacon Bacon Bacon

Congressman Don Bacon’s campaign announced today that he has raised over $270,000 for the second quarter of 2017, for a combined total of over half-a-million dollars raised this year.

This is the first time that a Second District Nebraska Congressman has raised over half-a-million dollars by the midpoint of a non-election year.

As a point of comparison, Brad Ashford raised under $355,000 at this same point two years ago, with only $155,000 raised during the second quarter.

 

Bacon Ads

In the mean time, the mini ad-war has already begun for the 2nd.

Oh, there are the pro-Bacon ads being run by the CLF, like these:

And then there are the negative ones, being run by MoveOn.org, like this:

That’s some pretty harsh stuff on Congressman Coffman…wait a minute.

Wait, no, Congressman Jason Lewis.

No, he doesn’t rep #NE02…

Oh, HERE it is.

No, that’s Darrell Issa.

Oh well. Point is, MoveOn.org doesn’t like a whole bunch of Congressmen who haven’t condemned most of the Trump family for their meetings.

(Wait til they find out that Brad Ashford was an early Jeb Bush supporter…)

 

Bacon Eds

Bacon also wrote an Op-Ed on the Fox New website published over the weekend.

He wrote, in part:
A defense bill to repair, restore and rebuild the world’s best military

When I joined the military in the 1980s, we flew double the number of flying training hours over our nearest competitors and had nearly twice the number of active-duty airmen. We had better tanks in the Army, better ships in the Navy, better planes in the Air Force, better technology in each Service, and were better in about every military capability. I have seen this American advantage slowly evaporate in every respect.

I was charged with preparing our forces to prevail over any adversary while commanding five different organizations, ranging from the squadron-level to base commands. Because of the massive budget reductions while in war, we are today trailing our peer adversaries in training, and our modernization programs and readiness stats are in the toilet. It is unconscionable to send our warriors to fight without every possible advantage.

This year’s National Defense Authority Act (NDAA) will begin to “right the ship” with a 10 percent topline increase. The NDAA directs the Department of Defense to reform their acquisition process to streamline bureaucracy and drive efficiency through competition. This bill highlights the repairs needed for better space and cyber capability to meet the equally expanding vulnerabilities in those areas. It restores a fully funded 2.4 percent military pay increase and grows the number of service members equally with our new global threats.

Read the entire piece here.

 

Follow @LeavenworthSt on the Twitter
Like Leavenworth Street – the talk of Nebraska politics on The Facebook

Ashford: Russian hacking may have led to my loss!

Democrat candidate for Congress, Brad Ashford was on the 1290 KOIL Matt Tompkins Show yesterday.

And he mumbled out this doozy:

I know this. What I DO know is that…as we’ve talked about on the show before is that our (campaign) emails were hacked in July and August of last year.
And we also know we were micro-targeted like some of the other races around the country by a few groups that may or may not have had access to Russian information.
I don’t know what impact that had on the election.

(At about the 32:00 mark of the show, if you want to listen…)

Uh….?
What. The. Hell?????

OK, Brad, if YOU’RE bringing it up, what exactly are you saying???

Are you suggesting that…what? That there was some sort of Russian micro-targeting that led to 2nd District voters choosing Don Bacon over you?

Was there something that came out from this “hacking” that turned the tables?

Enquiring minds want to know what in the hell you’re talking about!

 

Krist-mas in July

Well, State Senator Bob Krist has made if pseudo-official and declared himself a non-Republican.

Krist tells WOWT that he may challenge Governor Ricketts and…

He says he’s leaving the Republican Party and will now be an Independent politician.

Interesting that.

Well the Nebraska GOP’s ED, Kenny Zoeller, jumped to it and noted a few things about “Flip-Floppin’ Bob Krist”:

On July 13th, Senator Krist went back on a previous statement and switched political parties despite stating the following just two months ago:

“It has been suggested that I should run as an independent,” Krist said during an interview, thereby avoiding a direct GOP primary confrontation with Ricketts.

“But I am what I am,” Krist said. “I’m a Republican and I’m a centrist. I am not going to change my coat.”

This should come to no surprise to anyone as Senator Krist has a long history of saying one thing and doing another:

    • Flop: Introduces a bill to increase property taxes by $448 million over the next two years.
    • Flip: Promises to support reducing the cloture rule to 30 votes.
    • Flip: Senator Krist giving his word to vote for LB10 in 2016.

Psst! And THIS way, Krist won’t have to run in a Primary against anyone!
Looks like Jane and the Dems got their deal.
Now all they have to do is convince the ghost of Frank Morrison to run again…

 

Sasse über alles

Slate.com (weren’t they supposed to be a “magazine”?) put out  a lengthy article about Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse yesterday.

The folks on the Twitters were a little abuzz, noting the general regret about Senator Sasse. The gist?

The headline sums it up, for them:

The Wasted Mind of Ben Sasse: The Nebraska senator has urgent, persuasive ideas for saving American politics. Why won’t he act on them?

And all the Twitter-guys go…Yeah Slate! Exactly.
Though most for different reasons.

Some who have/had hope in Sasse, note that the guy who was supposed to be the “Obamacare Nemesis” has been anything but. One expected that he would be leading the charge, throwing around proposals, arguing the finer points of health care and insurance on FOX and MSNBC in back-to-back appearances.

Instead, his boldest proposal has been, “Let’s do this…later!

Which was all between book-tour appearances.

But there are others — from a leftier side of things — who also are “disappointed” in Sasse. And this is the side that Slate comes from:

See, they saw the Ivy League educated young Senator who has been busting Donald Trump’s balls since he made his way down the escalator…yet he still votes with the Republicans?

Sure the writer, Ben Mathis-Lilley, wants you to at-first believe that he doesn’t expect Sasse to vote like a Democrat…

What is most maddening about Sasse is not his party fealty per se—I’m not expecting a Republican senator to support left-wing policies; that’s not the standard we should hold him to—but the way he has outlined the basis for a path he has yet to take himself.

Riiiiiight. He’s not holding Sasse to a Democrat standard at all!

Oh wait. Yes he is:

But at the same time, Sasse’s Senate votes have so far aligned with Trump’s wishes 95 percent of the time, the same level of support that Trump has gotten from right-wing ideologues like Ted Cruz and party loyalists like Chuck Grassley.

And just so we can clearly nail down his real beef with Sasse, it’s right here:

At some point Sasse will have to actually interrupt Bill Maher; he’ll have to actually run against Donald Trump instead of suggesting that it would be nice if someone else did; he’ll have to challenge his own president not just by tweeting but by putting a hold on an executive-branch nominee until the Judiciary Committee, of which he’s a member, agrees to hearings on Trump’s obstruction of the FBI’s Russia investigation; he’ll have to refuse to vote for a motion to proceed on the health care bill until it gets a public hearing. It will be hard work, and he will get a lot of blowback from his own party and its dogmatic activists.

It’s comical really.

Here’s the deal: If Sasse hadn’t been the stone in Trump’s shoe, this article would NEVER have been written. Instead, they see Sasse as one of them: “He’s an East-coaster dressed up as a Nebraska yokel. He’s just fooling them! When will he come out and vote the way we want him to?!”

Of course if Sasse wants to prove himself among conservatives, he’ll also have to come up with a few more bold ideas that he can actually shepherd through the swamp. And of course he may have to cooperate with The Donald President in order to accomplish that.

The TED talks only get you so far.

Fischer talks Trump (Jr.)

Senator Fischer & an office VIP…along with Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch

On her weekly press call today, Nebraska U.S. Senator Deb Fischer, responding to a question, noted that were she in a similar situation as Donald Trump, Jr., she would NOT have taken the meeting with the Russian attorney regarding campaign information.

This was about as far as Fischer would go, noting that she was waiting for the results from the Special Counsel Investigation before passing any judgment on the matter further.

She did also note that there has been no facts presented by anyone that Russia affected the voting procedures in any state, or otherwise tampered with the voting process. She did not argue that Russia did or likely did attempt to influence the election.

And just as long as everyone is going to dive in on the subject, here are a couple of interesting notes:

1) From National Review’s Dan McLaughlin: “It’s Not Treason, but It’s Not Defensible, Either

2) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz: “Dershowitz slams New York Times op-ed for broaching Trump Jr. treason charge

A couple reviews from legal scholars about legal things.

 

#TeamLoser

Brad Ashford finally decided to take that big step and move away from his 2016 Twitter account.

He snatched up @BradAshford18 — dropping the “@BradAshford16” account altogether.

Ashford had been hanging on to that “16” account for some time, awkwardly using it as his 2018 campaign Twitter handle.

Alas, about 20 minutes after I followed him on the Twitter…

And, then his Twitterati reached out to my personal Twitter account, and blocked that too.

(Not to worry readers, he can’t block ALL of my accounts….MMWUHAHAHahahahhahhaha!)

 

Hey, FWIW, his opponent isn’t afraid of me:

Yet…

 

Fischer v Hack

And as long as we are discussing Senator Fischer, note that there is conflict in the Senator’s Washington office:

Both Senator Fischer, and her Chief of Staff, Joe Hack, have conflicting campaigns up right now…in the “Cutest Dogs on the Hill” competition.

Senator Fischer has her dog, Fred, in the running.

Hack has his dog, Rocco, in the competition.

In this election, it should be remembered that there are two outcomes for one’s pooch:

1st place.

Or LOSER.

When asked how people should vote, Senator Fischer simply replied:

#VoteForFred.

(We wait to see what their FEC and COH numbers look like…)

 

Follow @LeavenworthSt on the Twitter
Like Leavenworth Street – the talk of Nebraska politics on The Facebook

Nebraska GOPers on Sasse

US Senator Ben Sasse & Mark Fahleson

After his Ubering and speaking gigs in central Iowa last week, US News and World Report’s David Catanese wrote an extensive piece on Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse.

He writes all about a potential Presidential run for Sasse, his Twitter wars with candidate and President Trump, and his looming Nebraska re-election campaign in 2020.

And he goes to some local folks to get an insight on Sasse.

He starts with Lincoln attorney, early Sasse supporter and former Nebraska GOP Chairman Mark Fahleson:

“Ben and I have never had any conversation about him running for president,” says Mark Fahleson, a former chair of the Nebraska Republican Party and close friend of Sasse’s who accompanied him on the Iowa jaunt. “He generally regards the talk as nonsense.”

Well…Mark knows what line to give anyway.
Of course, no one really believes that.

Former Governor Dave Heineman, Mike Kennedy & Omaha Mayor Jean Stothert

And Catanese dives back in with remarks from Omaha attorney, GOP worker from many campaigns, and President of the Millard School Board, Mike Kennedy:

“What is he doing in Story County?” asks Mike Kennedy, a 25-year Republican activist from Omaha who is a withering critic of Sasse. “It’s like he’s nationalized the office. It’s the senator above it all, playing on the national stage. I think the visit to Iowa is to test a sounding board for a constitutional alternative. He wants to be the Trump alternative.”

And Leavenworth St.’s past note that Sasse may be going down a Senator Chuck Hagel path, is reiterated by Kennedy:

Kennedy says he sees the same type of sentiment that doomed Hagel brewing against Sasse back in Nebraska. When Sasse decided to give up a seat on the Agriculture Committee — leaving Nebraska with no senator on the committee for the first time in nearly 50 years — in order to move to the higher-profile Armed Services and Judiciary Committee, it sent ripples across the state.

“It’s the Sunday talk show thing. [Ag] is not sexy. He wanted visibility. Ben’s all about Ben Sasse,” says Kennedy, whose vocal criticism of Sasse have grown so loud they’ve earned him a call from Sasse’s deputy chief of staff.

Heh.

Well, at least Sasse’s staff is committed to outreach (with SOME individuals…).

And then the topic of 2020 — in Nebraska — is raised:

Sasse faces re-election to his Senate seat in 2020 — another race he has yet to commit to. That timing, in itself, would make it more difficult for him to mount a presidential bid.

Fahleson says Sasse is close to invincible at home, and that his critics amount to a small bastion of party activists still sore from their preferred candidate’s loss in the 2014 primary.

“If he runs for reelection he’ll win, he’ll have 5 million in the bank. No one will touch him,” he says. “There is no one out there.”

(Emphasis added)

Well, that’s an interesting one from Fahleson. His point about the amount of cash Sasse would have is well-taken. And it is something that any primary opposition would certainly note.

But the idea that he is “invincible” isn’t exactly canon in Nebraska. And certainly not around the party people — particularly those who still remember Sasse telling a Washington crowd back in 2016 that the Nebraska GOP “…are not necessarily representative of what most Americans think and what most Nebraskans think.

And the idea that there is “no one out there” simply is not true.

But again, Fahleson is saying what he probably should say.

Catanese closes with a quote from Kennedy, and a note about time…

Kennedy says Sasse has become more polarizing than meets the national eye.

“I think the party people are very skeptical of him. People are sharply divided on him. There are people who think he walks on water and a true deliverer of the conservative message. And then there’s the people in my camp, it’s almost Never Sasse. We see right through you. You haven’t delivered. Spend time writing bills on rewriting Obamacare, not on how to be parents,” he says, taking a shot at Sasse’s book.

Three years, of course, is an eternity in politics, both local and presidential.

But as Sasse showed, it’s never too soon to go to Iowa.

To hear more from these two, click these links to hear my interviews with Fahleson and Kennedy (individually) on The Wheels Down Politics Show.

 

Calling? Door-to-door? Hmmph!

The Washington Examiner has a recent story about the efforts of the Congressional Leadership Fund to send the message of Congressional Republicans across the land.

The CLF’s efforts include Nebraska’s 2nd District, which has been considered a swing district for quite some time.

The OWH also notes that the CLF has a full time staffer in the 2nd, as well as lots of student volunteers making phone calls and walking neighborhoods on behalf of Congressman Don Bacon.

Voter outreach sounds exactly what a campaign should be doing, right?

Not so fast, laughs Nebraska Democrat Chair, Jane Kleeb:

How weak is ? So weak he needs Ryan’s dark money SuperPac to knock doors over year before election

Bless her heart.
Jane wishes the Bacon folks were at home sipping lemonade instead of going hardcore grassroots and supporting their candidate.

Or maybe Jane feels that the more effective route is…protesting!
That’s it!

Those Baconistas should skip talking to actual voters, explaining the Congressman’s positions, and asking them how they feel about the issues. No, instead they should follow Ashford and Eastman around — preferably in black cloaks that have the F-word emblazoned on them — and hold up signs that say “Resist!” or “Not MY Congressman!” on them.

Now THAT’s effective campaigning.

And then the CLF should follow the whole thing up with a folk-music concert featuring a Socialist and anti-Semite.

But these are just suggestions, Team Bacon. You can do whatever you like. And if you think talking to voters (sniff!) is going to work, then well, whatever dude!

 

Payday

For your viewing pleasure, we will go all Platte Institute on you for a minute and draw your attention to an interesting comparison, from the Pew Charitable Trusts, of how the 50 states raise revenue.

Pew notes:

Taxes make up about half of state government revenue, with the bulk coming from levies on personal income and general sales of goods and services. Broad-based personal income taxes are the greatest source of tax dollars in 28 of the 41 states that impose them, with the highest share—69.6 percent—in Oregon. General sales taxes are the largest source in 17 of the 45 states that collect them. Texas is the most reliant on these taxes at 61.6 percent.

In fiscal year 2016, the share of total state tax revenue from personal income taxes grew to its largest percentage in at least 65 years. The share from general sales taxes also increased from the previous year, while those from corporate and severance taxes edged down.

An interesting look.