When I joined the military in the 1980s, we flew double the number of flying training hours over our nearest competitors and had nearly twice the number of active-duty airmen. We had better tanks in the Army, better ships in the Navy, better planes in the Air Force, better technology in each Service, and were better in about every military capability. I have seen this American advantage slowly evaporate in every respect.
I was charged with preparing our forces to prevail over any adversary while commanding five different organizations, ranging from the squadron-level to base commands. Because of the massive budget reductions while in war, we are today trailing our peer adversaries in training, and our modernization programs and readiness stats are in the toilet. It is unconscionable to send our warriors to fight without every possible advantage.
This year’s National Defense Authority Act (NDAA) will begin to “right the ship” with a 10 percent topline increase. The NDAA directs the Department of Defense to reform their acquisition process to streamline bureaucracy and drive efficiency through competition. This bill highlights the repairs needed for better space and cyber capability to meet the equally expanding vulnerabilities in those areas. It restores a fully funded 2.4 percent military pay increase and grows the number of service members equally with our new global threats.
I know this. What I DO know is that…as we’ve talked about on the show before is that our (campaign) emails were hacked in July and August of last year.
And we also know we were micro-targeted like some of the other races around the country by a few groups that may or may not have had access to Russian information.
I don’t know what impact that had on the election.
Psst! And THIS way, Krist won’t have to run in a Primary against anyone!
Looks like Jane and the Dems got their deal.
Now all they have to do is convince the ghost of Frank Morrison to run again…
Sasse über alles
Slate.com (weren’t they supposed to be a “magazine”?) put out a lengthy article about Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse yesterday.
The folks on the Twitters were a little abuzz, noting the general regret about Senator Sasse. The gist?
The headline sums it up, for them:
The Wasted Mind of Ben Sasse: The Nebraska senator has urgent, persuasive ideas for saving American politics. Why won’t he act on them?
And all the Twitter-guys go…Yeah Slate! Exactly.
Though most for different reasons.
Some who have/had hope in Sasse, note that the guy who was supposed to be the “Obamacare Nemesis” has been anything but. One expected that he would be leading the charge, throwing around proposals, arguing the finer points of health care and insurance on FOX and MSNBC in back-to-back appearances.
Instead, his boldest proposal has been, “Let’s do this…later!”
Which was all between book-tour appearances.
But there are others — from a leftier side of things — who also are “disappointed” in Sasse. And this is the side that Slate comes from:
See, they saw the Ivy League educated young Senator who has been busting Donald Trump’s balls since he made his way down the escalator…yet he still votes with the Republicans?
Sure the writer, Ben Mathis-Lilley, wants you to at-first believe that he doesn’t expect Sasse to vote like a Democrat…
What is most maddening about Sasse is not his party fealty per se—I’m not expecting a Republican senator to support left-wing policies; that’s not the standard we should hold him to—but the way he has outlined the basis for a path he has yet to take himself.
Riiiiiight. He’s not holding Sasse to a Democrat standard at all!
Oh wait. Yes he is:
But at the same time, Sasse’s Senate votes have so far aligned with Trump’s wishes 95 percent of the time, the same level of support that Trump has gotten from right-wing ideologues like Ted Cruz and party loyalists like Chuck Grassley.
And just so we can clearly nail down his real beef with Sasse, it’s right here:
At some point Sasse will have to actually interrupt Bill Maher; he’ll have to actually run against Donald Trump instead of suggesting that it would be nice if someone else did; he’ll have to challenge his own president not just by tweeting but by putting a hold on an executive-branch nominee until the Judiciary Committee, of which he’s a member, agrees to hearings on Trump’s obstruction of the FBI’s Russia investigation; he’ll have to refuse to vote for a motion to proceed on the health care bill until it gets a public hearing. It will be hard work, and he will get a lot of blowback from his own party and its dogmatic activists.
It’s comical really.
Here’s the deal: If Sasse hadn’t been the stone in Trump’s shoe, this article would NEVER have been written. Instead, they see Sasse as one of them: “He’s an East-coaster dressed up as a Nebraska yokel. He’s just fooling them! When will he come out and vote the way we want him to?!”
Of course if Sasse wants to prove himself among conservatives, he’ll also have to come up with a few more bold ideas that he can actually shepherd through the swamp. And of course he may have to cooperate with The Donald President in order to accomplish that.
On her weekly press call today, Nebraska U.S. Senator Deb Fischer, responding to a question, noted that were she in a similar situation as Donald Trump, Jr., she would NOT have taken the meeting with the Russian attorney regarding campaign information.
This was about as far as Fischer would go, noting that she was waiting for the results from the Special Counsel Investigation before passing any judgment on the matter further.
She did also note that there has been no facts presented by anyone that Russia affected the voting procedures in any state, or otherwise tampered with the voting process. She did not argue that Russia did or likely did attempt to influence the election.
And just as long as everyone is going to dive in on the subject, here are a couple of interesting notes:
He writes all about a potential Presidential run for Sasse, his Twitter wars with candidate and President Trump, and his looming Nebraska re-election campaign in 2020.
And he goes to some local folks to get an insight on Sasse.
He starts with Lincoln attorney, early Sasse supporter and former Nebraska GOP Chairman Mark Fahleson:
“Ben and I have never had any conversation about him running for president,” says Mark Fahleson, a former chair of the Nebraska Republican Party and close friend of Sasse’s who accompanied him on the Iowa jaunt. “He generally regards the talk as nonsense.”
Well…Mark knows what line to give anyway.
Of course, no one really believes that.
And Catanese dives back in with remarks from Omaha attorney, GOP worker from many campaigns, and President of the Millard School Board, Mike Kennedy:
“What is he doing in Story County?” asks Mike Kennedy, a 25-year Republican activist from Omaha who is a withering critic of Sasse. “It’s like he’s nationalized the office. It’s the senator above it all, playing on the national stage. I think the visit to Iowa is to test a sounding board for a constitutional alternative. He wants to be the Trump alternative.”
And Leavenworth St.’s past note that Sasse may be going down a Senator Chuck Hagel path, is reiterated by Kennedy:
Kennedy says he sees the same type of sentiment that doomed Hagel brewing against Sasse back in Nebraska. When Sasse decided to give up a seat on the Agriculture Committee — leaving Nebraska with no senator on the committee for the first time in nearly 50 years — in order to move to the higher-profile Armed Services and Judiciary Committee, it sent ripples across the state.
“It’s the Sunday talk show thing. [Ag] is not sexy. He wanted visibility. Ben’s all about Ben Sasse,” says Kennedy, whose vocal criticism of Sasse have grown so loud they’ve earned him a call from Sasse’s deputy chief of staff.
Well, at least Sasse’s staff is committed to outreach (with SOME individuals…).
And then the topic of 2020 — in Nebraska — is raised:
Sasse faces re-election to his Senate seat in 2020 — another race he has yet to commit to. That timing, in itself, would make it more difficult for him to mount a presidential bid.
Fahleson saysSasse is close to invincible at home, and that his critics amount to a small bastion of party activists still sore from their preferred candidate’s loss in the 2014 primary.
“If he runs for reelection he’ll win, he’ll have 5 million in the bank. No one will touch him,” he says. “There is no one out there.”
Well, that’s an interesting one from Fahleson. His point about the amount of cash Sasse would have is well-taken. And it is something that any primary opposition would certainly note.
But the idea that he is “invincible” isn’t exactly canon in Nebraska. And certainly not around the party people — particularly those who still remember Sasse telling a Washington crowd back in 2016 that the Nebraska GOP “…are not necessarily representative of what most Americans think and what most Nebraskans think.”
And the idea that there is “no one out there” simply is not true.
But again, Fahleson is saying what he probably should say.
Catanese closes with a quote from Kennedy, and a note about time…
Kennedy says Sasse has become more polarizing than meets the national eye.
“I think the party people are very skeptical of him. People are sharply divided on him. There are people who think he walks on water and a true deliverer of the conservative message. And then there’s the people in my camp, it’s almost Never Sasse. We see right through you. You haven’t delivered. Spend time writing bills on rewriting Obamacare, not on how to be parents,” he says, taking a shot at Sasse’s book.
Three years, of course, is an eternity in politics, both local and presidential.
But as Sasse showed, it’s never too soon to go to Iowa.
To hear more from these two, click these links to hear my interviews with Fahleson and Kennedy (individually) on The Wheels Down Politics Show.
Calling? Door-to-door? Hmmph!
The Washington Examiner has a recent story about the efforts of the Congressional Leadership Fund to send the message of Congressional Republicans across the land.
The CLF’s efforts include Nebraska’s 2nd District, which has been considered a swing district for quite some time.
The OWH also notes that the CLF has a full time staffer in the 2nd, as well as lots of student volunteers making phone calls and walking neighborhoods on behalf of Congressman Don Bacon.
Voter outreach sounds exactly what a campaign should be doing, right?
Not so fast, laughs Nebraska Democrat Chair, Jane Kleeb:
How weak is @RepDonBacon? So weak he needs Ryan’s dark money SuperPac to knock doors over year before election
Bless her heart.
Jane wishes the Bacon folks were at home sipping lemonade instead of going hardcore grassroots and supporting their candidate.
Or maybe Jane feels that the more effective route is…protesting!
Those Baconistas should skip talking to actual voters, explaining the Congressman’s positions, and asking them how they feel about the issues. No, instead they should follow Ashford and Eastman around — preferably in black cloaks that have the F-word emblazoned on them — and hold up signs that say “Resist!” or “Not MY Congressman!” on them.
Now THAT’s effective campaigning.
And then the CLF should follow the whole thing up with a folk-music concert featuring a Socialist and anti-Semite.
But these are just suggestions, Team Bacon. You can do whatever you like. And if you think talking to voters (sniff!) is going to work, then well, whatever dude!
For your viewing pleasure, we will go all Platte Institute on you for a minute and draw your attention to an interesting comparison, from the Pew Charitable Trusts, of how the 50 states raise revenue.
Taxes make up about half of state government revenue, with the bulk coming from levies on personal income and general sales of goods and services. Broad-based personal income taxes are the greatest source of tax dollars in 28 of the 41 states that impose them, with the highest share—69.6 percent—in Oregon. General sales taxes are the largest source in 17 of the 45 states that collect them. Texas is the most reliant on these taxes at 61.6 percent.
In fiscal year 2016, the share of total state tax revenue from personal income taxes grew to its largest percentage in at least 65 years. The share from general sales taxes also increased from the previous year, while those from corporate and severance taxes edged down.
After posting, Leavenworth St. received a statement from Ricketts for Governor campaign manager, Jessica Flanagain (formerly special adviser to the Governor for external affairs). See that statement at the bottom of the post.
So I got this one this morning:
Nebraska Governor (and Chicago Cubs co-owner) Pete Ricketts has…allegedly…apparently…been calling various people to form a committee to discuss whether he should run for President.
As you pick your jaw up off the keyboard, here’s what I have been told…or rather NOT told:
No word if this is about 2020 or 2024.
And that question is the real kicker.
So let’s hit the more logical route first:
Why start discussing an office that’s 7 years away now, when ANYTHING could happen between now and then? Why bring this up when word of this would get out very soon (like now)…only a month after Ricketts announced his re-election campaign for Governor?
Maybe he figures after former Speaker Mike Flood’s drop-out, he’s got the election in the bag, so no time like the present onto bigger and better things?
But 2024 is is so far away and just a little bizarre to actually open the Presidential run discussion.
Wouldn’t Ricketts be better off just doing his trade deals, cutting taxes, maybe an innocuous trip to Iowa to discuss the Missouri River? Possibly a more transparent trip to New Hampshire eventually?
Sure those are run-of-the-mill Presidential-campaign things to do. And to start a 2024 discussion would be more out-of-the-box-ish.
But starting a mini-committee to hash it out before the next election is even started?
So, how about 2020?
Well, timing-wise, 2020 would make a little more sense, right?
If Ricketts knew President Trump wasn’t going to run for re-election…
Because there’s no way Ricketts would challenge Trump in a primary (right?). Ever since Cruz dropped out of the 2016 Primary, Ricketts has been a Trump-guy through and through.
But there has been speculation that Trump won’t run in 2020. (Though probably more that he definitely will run…) It has been sort of off-handed, and not really supported by anything Trump has said or done. But it has been put out there.
And in the mean time, Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse is making trips to Iowa, and not saying that he won’t run.
All this sort of leads to…what does Pete Ricketts know?
Has he had it hinted to him that Trump is not going to run, and now is the time to get things going?
Or maybe has it been hinted by Mike Pence that Pence will be needing a running-mate, but it’s gotta be a guy who seems Presidential, so get on board.
Think about that: Who could Mike Pence find who wouldn’t overshadow him personality-wise, has some cred…and ohbytheway has billions to spend?
But the kicker on a 2020 Ricketts run is…that would make the upcoming 2018 Governor’s campaign about electing…Lt. Governor Mike Foley for Governor. It would make it very awkward if the whole thing became, “yeah but you’re hoping to quit in 2 years“.
Ricketts would have to be extremely cocky about that not being an issue in his campaign — and maybe he is.
But that wouldn’t make it any less strange.
And just think how Trump would feel if someone else was getting out front on news of any plans he has for a second term. (Something tells me Trump likes to control his messages…)
Crossing the Rubicon…er…Missouri
And in the mean time, let’s not forget about Nebraska’s junior Senator, Ben Sasse, and his foray into Iowa over the weekend.
He was in Nevada (that’s nuh-VEY-duh, to you) near Ames talking to the Story County GOP. And of course when Sasse was asked about his 2020 intentions, he once again deflected, saying neither yes, nor no, nor maybe nor anything else related.
And Sasse didn’t reveal anything unusual or notable at this shindig. But speaking of Trump, he apparently sent along a letter to the Story Co. GOP:
Story County GOP Chairman Brett Barker came to the podium to read a letter from Trump to the audience in which the president praised Iowa’s commitment to his candidacy in 2016 and fondly recalled visits to nearby Ames.
But Sasse’s coy-ness about the whole thing makes one wonder what he is hearing in the halls of Congress and what the national politicos really think.
It’s all some heavy speculation.
But a Ricketts move — if it means 2020 — is a serious log on the fire.
All of this sort of begs the question…could Pete Ricketts be President of the United States? Is he qualified? Could he get elected?
Hey feel free to dive into that if you’d like. The current opinion seems to be, “well if Donald Trump can do it…” But Ricketts ain’t Donald Trump. Maybe he’s Mike Pence. Or Dan Quayle?
He may see himself as a baseball owner with a famous father who everyone underestimated but ran a conservative state up to being President.
Sound like anyone you know? (Cough..43…cough.)
Does it seem…likely? Boy, I don’t see it.
But tell that to the hundreds who have run– and lost — for President.
But the discussion of the points for “why”are much more interesting at this point.
Statement from the Pete Ricketts for Governor campaign:
Governor Ricketts is not considering a run for President, nor has he called anyone to discuss a committee, or even the idea of forming a committee. He is not thinking about a run for any office other than re-election as Nebraska’s Governor.
– Jessica Flanagain
(She goes on to give the standard, “committed to his job”, “not taking election for granted”, “supports the President”, “has best job in the world”, etc.)
Here is all we will say from here:
Leavenworth St. received this information from a trusted, respected source who is very confident in the details that are laid out above.
But, the Ricketts camp gives a full denial.
We will get back to you if there are further details.
Nebraska 2nd District Congressman Don Bacon spent the 4th of July walking (and running) at various parades around the district.
At the GE George Parade in Dundee, the retired General marched dutifully along while being heckled by a group of Bacon-haters. (Not to be confused with the delicious Wendy’s sandwich.)
So when he got to Ralston, and the same gang was helping the folks there enjoy their 4th by yelling at the Congressman, Rep. Bacon decided to greet the creeps directly:
So who’s the guy who made his own “Bacon Kills / Bacon Sucks” stencils?
Oh, just a member of the Nebraska Democrat Party’s Central Committee.
His name is Mark Vondrasek and he enjoys being a thorn in everyone’s side.
Everyone’s? Yep, he is apparently on the side of the now infamous Chelsey Gentry-Tipton, –who wrote about her laughter at Congressmen after the assassination attempt, claimed she was the victim, then worked with a friend to (allegedly) blackmail a fellow party member before helping to get him booted from the party.
So, because Vondrasek is on Gentry-Tipton’s side, that means he’s ….anti-Democrat Party Chair Jane Kleeb.
So how do Kleeb and Bacon differ on their approach?
Don walked right up to this guy, and took a photo with him. Vondrasek as you can see, flipped the bird.
(That means he’s fighting against “The Man”, in case you weren’t down with the opposition’s call signs.)
But what does Jane do when questioned by the exact same guy? Let’s watch:
She turns tail and runs.
Well, she walks away as fast as she can.
Won’t answer his repeated questions. Won’t address him as a Central Committee member.
Smiles and flees.
What’s the idea again? They go low and we go high?
All politics is local, friends.
And it doesn’t get any more local than walking down the street in a parade. (Or, conversely, walking away.)
And just to put a bow on it, here’s how former Rep. Brad Ashford responded when asked a direct question about his party affiliation in a similar parade setting:
And these are always cool, so here’s KETV’s timelapse of the Omaha skyline on the evening of the 4th:
What’s turning into an annual thing here on Leavenworth St., one of my favorite stories from Stephen Ambrose’s book, Undaunted Courage, about the Lewis and Clark expedition.
In this excellent telling of the exploration by Lewis and Clark, Ambrose gives the following description of July 4, 1804:
On July 4, the men ushered in the day with a firing of the cannon.
At noon, the party pulled ashore at the mouth of a creek of some fifteen yards wide, “coming out of an extensive Prarie” on the left (west) side. As they ate, the captains questioned the voyagers. No, they knew no name for the creek.
The captains thereupon named it, their second experience in bestowing a name. They called it Independence Creek.
The expedition pulled over for the night at the site of an old Kansas Indian town. “We Camped in the plain,” Clark wrote, “one of the most butifull Plains I ever Saw, open & butifully diversified with hills & wallies all presenting themselves to the river covered with grass and a few scattering trees, a handsom Creek meandering thro.”
The captains ordered an extra gill distributed.
As they sipped their portions, they took in their surroundings and were quite overwhelmed. The country was covered with a sweet and nourishing grass, interspersed with copses of trees “Spreding ther lofty branchs over Pools Springs or Brooks of fine water. Groops of Shrubs covered with the most delicious froot is to be seen in every direction, and nature appears to have exerted herself to butify the Senery by the variety of flours Delicately and highly flavered raised above the Grass, which Strikes and profumes the Sensation, and amuses the mind.”
At sunset, the men again fired the cannon.
It was the first-ever Fourth of July celebration west of the Mississippi River.
As you (hopefully) fire up the grill, watch the parades go by and kick back with your favorite beverage while watching the rockets’ red glare, remember Lewis and Clark and their crew.
Out on the midwest plains they too fired their cannons, had an extra gill of whiskey, and admired the beauty of the land.
Earlier this week, Leavenworth St. that the Congressional Leadership Fund issued results of a poll showing Democrat Leader Nancy Pelosi’s low disapproval ratings in key Congressional Districts around the country.
Specifically, it noted that of 11 “swing” Districts polled, Nebraska’s 2nd District had the worst numbers for Pelosi — 60% disapproval.
So how did Nebraska Democrat Chair Jane Kleeb respond to reporter Joe Jordan’s question about Pelosi being a “drag”?
“She is not a drag at all. I think when the Republican Party attacks a strong woman and a mother mocking her and trying to villainize her it says more about their feelings on women.”
And it should be clear that when Kleeb and her Democrat buddies go to the “strong woman” card, she is flailing about on her rudderless ship.
How do Nebraska Republicans feel about actual strong women?
Oh I don’t know, maybe we could ask, Nebraska’s Senior U.S. Senator Deb Fischer?
Or maybe the Mayor of it’s largest city, Jean Stothert?
Then we could talk to the Mayor of it’s 3rd largest city (not including Memorial Stadium, of course) Rita Sanders in Bellevue.
How about the only woman on the Omaha City Council, Republican Aimee Melton?
And we could all go on and on through every level of government in Nebraska, talking to strong REPUBLICAN women.
As for the Democrats?
Well we know that the hard-core state Democrats, like Jane, chose an old white man over their female candidate in the state caucuses.
While there was already a female candidate in the 2nd District, another old white male Democrat re-treaded the campaign tires for his campaign.
And women in the state party, such as FORMER Democrat Central Committee member Linda Anderson, are leaving the party hierarchy because of the issues the leadership has with continually propping up “white, male, lawyers”, as she put it.
Heck, after much fanfare about a second woman running for Congress in the 2nd, Brad Ashford’s wife didn’t even issue a press release saying that she decided not to run — leaving it to Brad to start spouting off about wanting just keep running for office.
Yes Jane, there is a problem with one of Nebraska’s parties and strong female elected officials.
And it would be wise of you to start fixing that problem the Nebraska Democrats clearly have.
Which leads us back to Brad Ashford.
Here is Jane Kleeb worrying that the GOP can’t support Nancy Pelosi…when her own candidates can’t decide whether they support her!
Ashford responded to the Pelosi-drag poll with his finger in the air about whether or not he would AGAIN vote for her for Speaker:
“I haven’t gotten to that in my head, deciding what I’d do.”
Gee Brad, what is it you have against “strong women”???
Brad calls his support of Nancy Pelosi, “inside baseball”.
Well, no, this is something voters would like to actually know about a candidate: where they stand on the issues, and who they support driving the agenda in Washington. Heck, this is particularly the case in the House, where the Speaker decides what does and does not get done.
So here’s the deal Brad:
We will just assume that your past support for Nancy Pelosi — voting for her for Speaker, having her to Omaha for a private dinner-date — means that you STILL support her, and her agenda.
Unless you feel that breeze chill your finger, and you change your mind.
We still remember when you told voters you didn’t know what party you were in, or when you suggested you might vote Jeb Bush for President.
We realize you’ll do anything to get re-elected.
And just to round things out, hey LJS Editorial Board, you might need a visit from the boys at Project Veritas, after your recent editorial.
They suggested that because Senator Deb Fischer didn’t want the loony-bins from Betsy Riot and Indivisible Nebraska disrupting her campaign announcement in Lincoln, that it encourages a feeling of non-accessibility.
LJS, when you write this garbage, it encourages a feeling of dishonesty in the media.
You know, I know and everyone knows that events like this are private, and you can exclude anyone you want.
AND, Deb Fischer has been holding Town Halls throughout her Senate career.
She is accessible to all of her constituents at any official function.
Former Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman kicked up a bit of a storm yesterday on KLIN’s Drive Time Lincoln, with host Coby Mach. Mach asked Heineman about his interest in running again for Governor.
Hear it here (at about the 12:00 mark):
Heineman demurred, saying he is happy with his life.
But he went a step further:
“I will say I think (former Nebraska Speaker of the Legislature) Mike Flood would make an outstanding Governor.”
Mach followed up:
“Do you anticipate endorsing Pete Ricketts?’
“I think the Governor’s had some challenges…he needs to work through those…I’m disappointed we haven’t solved the property tax issue here in Nebraska. We made progress on that when I was Governor, but in last few years we let that go by the wayside.”
That certainly wasn’t a “yes”.
(And some would note that it probably wasn’t lost on the former Governor to needle Ricketts while he was mugging with his World Series trophy in the Oval Office on Wednesday…)
So Leavenworth St. dug a little deeper.
It seems that there is definitely an interest out there from Mike Flood. If there is a number on Flood’s interest, some say (purely speculatively at this point) that it is over 50%.
Which is also an interesting number.
Because Leavenworth St. has also heard that there has been some polling of Nebraska GOP likely voters.
And that polling currently shows, Governor Pete Ricketts’ re-elect number, from GOP primary voters, is UNDER 50%.
State that again: fewer than 50% of those polled said they definitely would vote for Ricketts. That’s just a bit shocking in Nebraska’s political climate.
So back to Flood.
You may remember that he dropped out of the 2014 Governor’s race when his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. After speculation (by Leavenworth St. and others) that he would get back in the race, that obviously never happened, and he continued in the radio business in Norfolk.
Well, jump to 2017, and Flood’s wife Mandi has a clean bill of health.
Flood still has a record as one of the most popular Speakers in recent Nebraska Unicameral history. He could potentially have the support of Nebraska’s longest serving Governors.
And Leavenworth St. has also heard that there are some very powerful groups in Nebraska who could also be behind a Flood candidacy — which groups, we have to play coy on now.
And there’s the surprisingly low Ricketts re-elect numbers.
Does this add up to a Mike Flood challenge of an incumbent Governor, who has already announced his re-election campaign, and has pockets so deep they run to his ankles and down the street?
Not so fast.
A number of other factors would have to be present.
Like, just what sort of support could Flood get to be competitive with the limitless financial resources of the owners of the Chicago Cubs?
It’s not impossible. All the Joe Ricketts cash in the world couldn’t push Pete Ricketts past Ben Nelson in 2006. Then again, Nelson, like Ricketts now, was an incumbent. And that ain’t for nothin’.
And, FWIW, some Democrats are already hoping to see Ricketts go down to give them some sort of a chance at the Governor’s Lincoln McMansion. (Hope springs eternal!)
But things are very fluid.
And Leavenworth St. will keep you updated.